Patriot Group Home Page
‹ Back To Insights
Horizon BCBS to Pay $100M in New Jersey False Claims Settlement

Quick Summary

  • New Jersey reached a $100M settlement with Horizon over alleged violations of its 2020 state health plan contract.
  • State claims Horizon ignored the “lesser-of” billing rule and submitted 1,000+ inaccurate claims.
  • Horizon denies wrongdoing, calling it a contract interpretation dispute.
  • Whistleblowers receive $12M; remaining funds go to state benefits programs.
  • Horizon will continue administering state plans under enhanced oversight.

Background

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin announced a $100 million settlement resolving claims that Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield misled the state to secure a contract administering health plans covering more than 750,000 public employees, retirees, and dependents.

The allegations center on the contract’s “lesser-of” provision, which required Horizon to bill the state the lower of either a provider’s charge or Horizon’s negotiated rate. State prosecutors say Horizon certified compliance before bidding, despite knowing it could not meet the requirement, and then ignored it once the contract took effect.

Investigators identified more than 1,000 inaccurate or inflated claims, as well as EOBs that misstated charges. Horizon received nearly $500 million in administrative fees during the contract period.

Whistleblower and Enforcement Actions

The case originated under the New Jersey False Claims Act, which allows private individuals to bring claims on the state’s behalf. Five whistleblowers—including former PBA officials and benefits consultants—will share $12 million from the settlement.

Horizon will keep its current contract but must comply with enhanced oversight, including daily claims access, quarterly reviews, and expanded financial reporting.

Horizon’s Response

Horizon denies the allegations and argues the issue reflects a difference in contract interpretation, not fraud. The insurer says the disputed charges represented less than 0.5% of total provider payments and emphasizes that it did not retain any portion of the amounts billed to the state.

What This Means for Providers

Although the case focuses on overcharges to the state, it signals broader trends affecting providers:

  • Increased scrutiny of payer billing practices
  • Greater attention to billed vs. negotiated rates
  • Heightened transparency and reporting expectations
  • Potential spillover into audit activity and claims oversight

Providers should ensure their documentation, billing practices, and payer communications are aligned with contract obligations—particularly when treating members of large public plans.

How Patriot Group Can Help
Patriot Group supports healthcare organizations as regulatory oversight intensifies. Our team assists providers with:

  • Compliance reviews of claims and billing accuracy
  • Guidance on payer contract requirements
  • Audit preparation and documentation support
  • Strengthening internal compliance processes
The full settlement and complaint documents are available here and here.

 

Patriot Group will continue monitoring payer enforcement actions and regulatory developments affecting providers. Contact Thomas J. Force, Esq., President and Founder of Patriot Group, at [email protected] or call (631) 870-4040 to discuss how these changes may impact your organization.
Patriot Group Go To Home Page
Go To Patriot Group Facebook PageGo To Patriot Group LinkedIn Page
crossmenu